Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Hunting > Long Range Hunting & Shooting

Long Range Hunting & Shooting Nightforce Optics


Reply

.222, .221, .223?

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #8  
Old 04-28-2007, 04:22 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oracle, Az
Posts: 73
Re: .222, .221, .223?

You ought to pop the turkeys head off with the .204.
__________________
NRA Life
Arizona Desert Bighorn Sheep Society
Arizona Antelope Foundation
Arizona Wildlife Foundation
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-28-2007, 07:53 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 121
Re: .222, .221, .223?

I really had no idea how hard it would be to decide on this. I'm leaning towards a .223 Cooper, but not really sure.
__________________
Just another beautiful day in paradise!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-28-2007, 08:05 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Oshkosh, WI
Posts: 225
Re: .222, .221, .223?

[ QUOTE ]
I really had no idea how hard it would be to decide on this. I'm leaning towards a .223 Cooper, but not really sure.

[/ QUOTE ]
If you are thinking about a Cooper and you reload think about a 223 Ackley Improved.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-28-2007, 08:34 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Arkansas / Oklahoma / Boarder
Posts: 690
Re: .222, .221, .223?

Just go with an 22 250 I Thank you will be happier with it .

I would take look at the 22 250

Redbone
__________________
7 MM STW

Kill more Coyotes

Feed The Buzzards
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-28-2007, 08:41 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NW NC
Posts: 85
Re: .222, .221, .223?

I shoot a Rem classic in 221Fb for just the type of game and distances you mention.Can't imagine a better round for the job.Extreme accuracy,low report,minimal damage on game and furbearers,and easy to get to shoot with a variety of bullets/powders.I've had enough experience with the 223 and 223AI to say they seem to pack a bit too much punch to be truly ideal on turkeys.Head shots? Good luck cause in my experience a turkey's head is never still long enough for a shot. Just my .02 worth.
Brute
__________________
Let's get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US !!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-28-2007, 08:51 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 121
Re: .222, .221, .223?

Brute,

I know what you mean on the turkey's head never being still. I had thought about the FireBall, but don't have any experience with it and I don't know anyone who does. Seems like somebody had Rem 700 LVSF .221s on closeout not too long ago.

Is a .22 Hornet even worth considering?
__________________
Just another beautiful day in paradise!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-28-2007, 09:30 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Potters Hill, NC
Posts: 1,528
Re: .222, .221, .223?

Rolltide,
For that range I'd go with the .223 Rem. I have had a couple of .22-250's (BDL Varmint and VS) and while they're accurate, fast and terminal at that range, I've yet to have a crow "outrun" the same bullet from a .223.
The .223 is a tad more economical and just as accurate. Less powder, muzzle blast and recoil (and velocity). Case capacity is 31.4 grains for the .223 and 44.6 for the .22-250.
A couple of years ago I swore by the .22-250 and it's still a hotrod, but I started playing around with the little .223 and kinda lost interest in the "varminter".
I've never owned a .222 but would love to have one in the ole BDL Varmint Special (1970's). Never have been impressed with the Fireball or Hornet and the Swift is tooo much of a good thing (IMO).
Hope some of this helped. JohnnyK.
__________________
"The pleasure you get from life is equal to the attitude you put into it."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC