Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Hunting > Long Range Hunting & Shooting

Long Range Hunting & Shooting Nightforce Optics


Reply

140 TSX or 150 Scirrocco

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-16-2004, 07:34 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 57
140 TSX or 150 Scirrocco

Will be working up a load for my 7mm STW before long and was wondering which bullets you guys reccommended. i will be hunting whitetails and exotic deer, hogs, and anything else up to aoudad or possibly red deer. Will the Scirroccos hold up to 7mm STW velocities at short ranges? Most shots will be at less than 250 but may have some long ones out to or beyond 500.
Thanks,
Gene Cole III

[ 06-16-2004: Message edited by: Gene Cole III ]
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-16-2004, 07:39 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 649
Re: 140 TSX or 150 Scirrocco

I would go with the TSX just make sure you have a clear shot or you will be picking up two animals instead of one. [img]images/icons/grin.gif[/img]
__________________
Fast, Flat, and Accurate
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-16-2004, 08:29 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 57
Re: 140 TSX or 150 Scirrocco

I have had good luck with the performance of the 160 TSX on deer. the one i shot with a previous STW was about 80 yards away and the bullet penetrated about 25-30 inches and broke a shoulder on the way out. it was under the hide on the off side and weighed 160.1 grains. i was thinking the 140 might give me a little more velocity to open up on those long shots better.
Gene Cole III
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-17-2004, 09:57 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 649
Re: 140 TSX or 150 Scirrocco

Gene I shoot both the 140 and 160 TSX in my 7MM STW Remington Sendero with the 140gr I am at 3613 fps and with the 160gr 3276 fps and there are no signs of pressure from either load but every rifle is different. I would say with the 140gr you should be able to get around the 3500 fps mark pretty easy if you have a 26 inch barrel. Dont worry about a Barnes X with close shots I dont think there is a cartridge that can push them fast enough to come apart they are probably the tuffest bullet I have seen and they take game down quick if you do your part.
__________________
Fast, Flat, and Accurate
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-17-2004, 06:06 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Re: 140 TSX or 150 Scirrocco

Gene Cole III,

Last October I shot A Mulie and An antelope in Wyoming with my 7 STW. I used the Barnes XLC's (Blue Meanies!) because at that time there was no TSX to speak of.

I'll tell you this, Mulie 216 Yards and Lope at 48 yards. Neither took a step. Dropped in their tracks.

The terminal performance of this bullet is the best. You are not going to blow it up.

The accuracy of the XLC's was pitiful. So I switched to 156 Cauterucios. The TSX just came out when I purchased the Cauterucio's or I would have tried them next. This was before the good reports on the TSX bullets and I wasn't about to try barnes again.
I was very angry about passing up a 290 yard shot on a beautiful lope because these bullets were shooting so bad.

If you can shoot TSX with good accuracy....do it!

One note about the 7 STW. This is a fast 7mm. You may want to try the heavier bullets like 160's in order to improve accuracy. The 3600 FPS of the 140s might not be as accurate as the 3200-3300 fps of the 160.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-18-2004, 02:22 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 84
Re: 140 TSX or 150 Scirrocco

I have shot a lot of both the Scirocco and the XBT in the 7mm STW and I prefer the Scirocco.

This is based on seeing over 15 bulls in the past 2 years shot with both bullets (in 7mm STWs) at ranges from 200 to 800 yds.

The Scirocco will not penetrate as deeply but makes a larger wound channel and I get more slap for lack of a better word with the Sciroccos. Most of the game we shoot for the show is broadside and there is plenty of penetration for any reasonable shot.

Because the game you are listing is significantly smaller than elk I bet you won’t have any problem with penetration.

The real answer is what ever you want to use because I have a hard time believing you will ever lose an animal to either bullet because they are both very good.

X bullets trade some wound channel diameter for length and Sciroccos trade some length for diameter.
__________________
John Burns
www.greybullprecision.com
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-27-2004, 03:26 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Mukilteo, WA
Posts: 1,091
Re: 140 TSX or 150 Scirrocco

The Scirocco will have a MUCH higher BC than the TSX and be much easier to hit with in the 600 yd range if you get similar accuracy. But if they're too soft for your tastes for close shots, you might want to look at the 160 AccuBond. It'll have a slightly higher BC than the Swift and I'd trust it to penetrate farther at close range.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: 140 TSX or 150 Scirrocco
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Swift released the new 6.5mm Scirrocco, 130 gr, BC .571 !! big-foot Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 5 10-20-2005 06:16 PM
6.5 Scirrocco JD Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 0 07-04-2004 08:17 AM
Scirrocco fouling genecole Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 0 06-22-2004 05:31 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC