Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Hunting > Extreme Long Range Hunting & Shooting (ELR)

Extreme Long Range Hunting & Shooting (ELR) Over 1,000 Yds.


Reply

338 285 amax. What do you think for elr.

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-27-2013, 08:14 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 439
338 285 amax. What do you think for elr.

What do you think the 285 amx would do for elr. Do you think it would open up good for the elr like 1400 and out or what? I am not saying would it be better than the berger otm. But being they are soft do you think they would be the same as the elite hunter, I would thing they would open more consistent. May it be good or bad.
Also would it be a fair test of shooting them into test media, I seen John burns testing the bergers along time ago. He had a box and was shooting them into wet news paper sandwiched with a beef shoulder in there. He shot all the way to like 700 yards testing but ended up having a tough time hitting precise enough. I was wondering if I tested them, and I put them in one of these old 338 wins with a slow load and shoot at a distance where impacts would be about the same as the distance of 1400-1800 yards? I know nothing acts like flesh and blood. But would this tell me anything?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-28-2013, 11:20 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: southeast Idaho
Posts: 278
Re: 338 285 amax. What do you think for elr.

If there anything like the 208g version they should do great. I don't understand why hornady likes to be second behind berger.they should have bumped it to 300g and made something really special.although the 285bthp worked well for me accuracy wise and I'm sure the tooling must be the same? Only reason I can think they didn't make it a little heavier. A 300 amax you would think would be above that .8 bc . Would make for one bad amax. I'm thinking they'll work great at longer range maybe a tad soft for close shoulder shots on big animals. The 208 version never let me down. Problem for me is the big berger shoots so good in my gun I have no advantage shooting the amax.
I was hoping like the 30 cal offerings the price would be cheaper, in 33 cal they're about the same as anything else. I'm eagerly waiting for the 300g nosler custom comp at 47 per 100. That will be a good enough price break for me to save the bergers for serious stuff and practice with them if they shoot well but at that price I'm sure they'll be hard to find. Let us know how to the big amax works out.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-02-2014, 02:18 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Aumsville Or
Posts: 27
Re: 338 285 amax. What do you think for elr.

They work great on deer! We have shot 2 deer out of a 280ai with them and they perform great. Not so great on elk. A body of mine shot a spike elk at 70 yards with the 280ai, high shoulder shot and the bullet blew up on impact. No penetration at all. This year a friend shot a six point bull with a 300wsm at 350 yards in the shoulder same thing. Another spike was shot this year with the same 300wsm by another friend at 25 yards, the bull dropped and on there way up to him the bull jumped up and took off in thick brush and they spent a couple hours looking before they ran into him and put another one in him. Three different bulls and they all blew up. Not sure if this helps at all, just are experiences with them. haven't done anything with a 338 or pushed them past a 1000 shooting the 280ai or the 300wsm.
__________________
''SAY WHEN''
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-02-2014, 10:23 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 141
Re: 338 285 amax. What do you think for elr.

I understand the high shoulder shot at long range---the need to incapacitate the animal in its tracks when you probably won't get a chance for a follow up. But why take the shoulder shot at all at close range on a deer or elk? It destroys way too much meat and too often results in bullet failure. Aiming for a "soft spot" in the ribs, right behind the shoulder, takes out both lungs and deer/elk seldom go more than 50 yards, leaving plenty of blood trail, and wasting virtually no meat. Just curious why anyone would take a close range shoulder shot on non-dangerous game if a double lung rib shot is available? I've asked my shoulder-shooting friends that question, and never got a convincing answer.

I'd like to hear more about the 280 AI load that your friend was using...what was the bullet weight, MV, and powder charge? How far does he shoot it accurately?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-02-2014, 11:03 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 439
Re: 338 285 amax. What do you think for elr.

I have learned to either stick it in front of the shoulder bust the neck or behind the shoulder to keep away from potential bullet failure. I was just wondering if that 285 grain bullet would really put a hurting on animals and work reliably out far. I had a berger that everyone said tumbled and I was thinking so for awhile but that bullet didn't. You look at the hole through the shoulder area and it is .338 diameter not 1.5".
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-02-2014, 11:21 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Townsend, Montana.
Posts: 7,934
Re: 338 285 amax. What do you think for elr.

I think for the distances you are talking here one should look long and hard at true bullet BC's of each. Wind drift would be the most important thing I would be dealing with in an effort to place the bullet as well I I could and as easily as possible with the least amount of error.

Jeff
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-02-2014, 07:25 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Aumsville Or
Posts: 27
Re: 338 285 amax. What do you think for elr.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BCMAG2 View Post
I understand the high shoulder shot at long range---the need to incapacitate the animal in its tracks when you probably won't get a chance for a follow up. But why take the shoulder shot at all at close range on a deer or elk? It destroys way too much meat and too often results in bullet failure. Aiming for a "soft spot" in the ribs, right behind the shoulder, takes out both lungs and deer/elk seldom go more than 50 yards, leaving plenty of blood trail, and wasting virtually no meat. Just curious why anyone would take a close range shoulder shot on non-dangerous game if a double lung rib shot is available? I've asked my shoulder-shooting friends that question, and never got a convincing answer.

I'd like to hear more about the 280 AI load that your friend was using...what was the bullet weight, MV, and powder charge? How far does he shoot it accurately?
I have always just liked dropping them in there tracks if possible, deer or elk. Elk on the other hand have a will to live and can take some punishment, as most us know. I personally don't like to put any more rounds than necessary to get them down. So shoulder is just personal preference. The 280ai shoots a 162 amax, mv is 2785, 26'', 9 twist, 59.5 h4831sc
__________________
''SAY WHEN''
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC