Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Hunting > Wolf Hunting


Reply

Colorado....they better take heed!

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-27-2012, 07:50 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Miles City, Montana
Posts: 174
Colorado....they better take heed!

How about increasing hunter licenses or quotas in the area instead? This is going to be something they will soon regret!

From this mornings Billings Gazette:

ALAMOSA, Colo. -- Federal officials are considering using wolves to control the number of elk in Baca National Wildlife Refuge, a proposal that is drawing criticism from hunters and ranchers and support from environmentalists.
And a plan that is drawing comparisons to what has happened in Montana and Wyoming since wolf reintroduction in Yellowstone National Park.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service planner Laurie Shannon says the use of wolves in Colorado is not the preferred alternative, but it's an option for controlling elk herds that have taken a heavy toll on the cottonwoods and willows lining stream banks.
"Right now, it's a question. You have a lot of elk, a lot of people would say you need a large predator. We may not move forward with it, but right now it's on the table," she said.
Federal officials have drafted four possible options for managing the Alamosa, Baca and Monte Vista national wildlife refuges as they develop a comprehensive conservation plan. The wolf proposal is one of four presented at public workshops this week, but wildlife officials don't expect to select one until 2014.
Other options include largely keeping things as they are now, allowing hunting to help control elk populations and maximizing public uses.
Researchers cite the 1996 reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone National Park for scattering elk herds and allowing the recovery of park lands, but wolves outside the park's boundaries have aroused opposition from ranchers, hunters and other groups.
Wyoming Gov. Matt Mead and U.S. Secretary of Interior Ken Salazar reached an agreement last year on a plan that would turn wolf management over to the state. The plan, which has drawn criticism from environmentalists, would classify wolves as predators that could be shot on sight in most of the state.
Congress recently stripped language out of an Interior appropriations bill that would have blocked legal challenges to the Wyoming plan. The Wyoming Legislature is set to consider its adoption, nonetheless, in the session that starts next month.
Mead said this week that he's still hopeful that Congress will restore the no-lawsuit provision. Congress already has passed such language blocking legal challenges to delisting wolves in Idaho and Montana as an endangered species.
Environmental groups advocated releasing wolves in Rocky Mountain National Park in northern Colorado. The National Park Service rejected that plan as a way to reduce the elk herd that is overgrazing the park and instead is using sharpshooters to help cut the number of elk.
__________________
"May God bless our troops, and Hell welcome our enemies!"
"For those who fought for it, Freedom has a flavor the protected will never know!"
Assistant State Captain, Retired, Patriot Guard Riders, West Tennessee
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-27-2012, 09:38 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,421
Re: Colorado....they better take heed!

Quote:
Originally Posted by szeitner View Post
How about increasing hunter licenses or quotas in the area instead? This is going to be something they will soon regret!

From this mornings Billings Gazette:

ALAMOSA, Colo. -- Federal officials are considering using wolves to control the number of elk in Baca National Wildlife Refuge, a proposal that is drawing criticism from hunters and ranchers and support from environmentalists.
And a plan that is drawing comparisons to what has happened in Montana and Wyoming since wolf reintroduction in Yellowstone National Park.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service planner Laurie Shannon says the use of wolves in Colorado is not the preferred alternative, but it's an option for controlling elk herds that have taken a heavy toll on the cottonwoods and willows lining stream banks.
"Right now, it's a question. You have a lot of elk, a lot of people would say you need a large predator. We may not move forward with it, but right now it's on the table," she said.
Federal officials have drafted four possible options for managing the Alamosa, Baca and Monte Vista national wildlife refuges as they develop a comprehensive conservation plan. The wolf proposal is one of four presented at public workshops this week, but wildlife officials don't expect to select one until 2014.
Other options include largely keeping things as they are now, allowing hunting to help control elk populations and maximizing public uses.
Researchers cite the 1996 reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone National Park for scattering elk herds and allowing the recovery of park lands, but wolves outside the park's boundaries have aroused opposition from ranchers, hunters and other groups.
Wyoming Gov. Matt Mead and U.S. Secretary of Interior Ken Salazar reached an agreement last year on a plan that would turn wolf management over to the state. The plan, which has drawn criticism from environmentalists, would classify wolves as predators that could be shot on sight in most of the state.
Congress recently stripped language out of an Interior appropriations bill that would have blocked legal challenges to the Wyoming plan. The Wyoming Legislature is set to consider its adoption, nonetheless, in the session that starts next month.
Mead said this week that he's still hopeful that Congress will restore the no-lawsuit provision. Congress already has passed such language blocking legal challenges to delisting wolves in Idaho and Montana as an endangered species.
Environmental groups advocated releasing wolves in Rocky Mountain National Park in northern Colorado. The National Park Service rejected that plan as a way to reduce the elk herd that is overgrazing the park and instead is using sharpshooters to help cut the number of elk.

And these people are supposed to be educated??????

Hunting can be controlled by numbers or quotas. Wolfs cant !!!! do they plan on writing the wolfs a ticket or taking them to jail if they screw up ?

Just more of the federal government telling us what we need.

J E CUSTOM
__________________
"PRESS ON"
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-27-2012, 09:44 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Townsend, Montana.
Posts: 7,769
Re: Colorado....they better take heed!

I Already sent a letter. Very easy for you to do too with Big Game Forevers link.

Big Game Forever - Protecting Big Game Abundance for Future Generations[capwiz:queue_id]

Jeff
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-27-2012, 11:37 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 2,304
Re: Colorado....they better take heed!

Mine is sent also.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-27-2012, 11:47 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,082
Re: Colorado....they better take heed!

Weren't wolves native to Washington DC, perhaps they should be used on the vermin inhabiting that cesspool!

edge.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-06-2012, 07:23 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: western U.S.A.
Posts: 74
Re: Colorado....they better take heed!

Ca. and the east coast seem to want them badly, maybe some should be released there to take care of the homeless!!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Colorado....they better take heed!
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Guy in Colorado thetrio Member Introductions 1 12-14-2010 10:47 PM
Attention UT hunters, Read and heed!!!!! kmcintosh78 Coyote Hunting - From 10 Yards to over 1,000 Yards 1 04-05-2010 07:22 AM
Hi from Colorado wbhco2009 Member Introductions 3 11-29-2009 08:39 PM
Hello from Colorado Crazy4Elk Member Introductions 3 02-21-2009 06:59 PM
Hello from Colorado asr1 Member Introductions 3 01-03-2009 11:49 PM

Current Poll
Do you watch outdoor shows live or by recording them?
Always recorded - 13.07%
112 Votes
Mostly recorded - 24.27%
208 Votes
Sometimes recorded - 15.05%
129 Votes
Rarely or never recorded - 47.61%
408 Votes
Total Votes: 857
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC