Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Hunting > Wolf Hunting


Reply

Anti's Sue Over Wyo Wolves....Again

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-30-2012, 10:28 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Gillette, WY
Posts: 2,763
Anti's Sue Over Wyo Wolves....Again

Just in case you gents haven't seen this: From Predator Xtreme Magazine-- November 14th



News
Environmental groups sue over Wyoming wolves
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service never should have accepted a wolf-management plan that allows the state of Wyoming to classify the animals as predators that may be shot on sight, environmental groups say.

CHEYENNE, Wyo. (AP) — The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service never should have accepted a wolf-management plan that allows the state of Wyoming to classify the animals as predators that may be shot on sight, environmental groups said in a federal lawsuit filed Tuesday in Washington, D.C.
A coalition of groups asked a federal judge to force the Fish and Wildlife Service to rescind its transfer of wolf management authority to Wyoming and protect them once again under the federal Endangered Species Act. The Fish and Wildlife Service turned over wolf management to Wyoming on Oct. 1 after signing off on a state plan that declares wolves as predators that may be shot on sight in more than 80 percent of the state.
The state plan also allows trophy game hunting of wolves in a flexible zone around Yellowstone. As of Tuesday, licensed hunters in Wyoming had killed at least 33 of the maximum 52 wolves the state is allowing them to kill this year in the trophy area.
Wyoming has committed to maintaining at least 10 breeding pairs of wolves and at least 100 individual animals outside of Yellowstone and the Wind River Indian Reservation, in the central part of the state. Wildlife managers estimated there were roughly 300 wolves outside of Yellowstone, where no hunting is allowed, when the state took over.
“What the (Fish and Wildlife) Service does, in setting the benchmark for delisting of wolves is an important precedent for its treatment of species all across the country, said Tim Preso, a Montana lawyer who represents the coalition. The groups in the lawsuit are the Defenders of Wildlife, Natural Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club and Center for Biological Diversity.
“Wolves get a lot of attention; people care a lot about wolves. The service is under the microscope when it comes to dealing with wolves. And if it's good enough with respect to wolves to say that a free-fire zone in 85 percent of the state is OK, I think we're very concerned that sets a terrible precedent for other species,'' Preso said.
While some Wyoming sportsmen and ranchers say they're concerned that wolves take an unacceptable toll on wildlife and livestock, environmental groups long have protested that a series of proposed state wolf management plans have failed to offer adequate protection to ensure the species' long-term survival.
Wyoming Gov. Matt Mead said Tuesday that the groups suing the federal government apparently have decided to go to court regardless of what's happening on the ground in the state.
Mead worked with U.S. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar to come to agreement on delisting wolves in the state. Mead has emphasized that the state is committed to making sure that it maintains the wolf population and doesn't risk having the federal government take over management again.
“Rather than looking at Wyoming's successful efforts, these groups are suing based on what they wanted,'' Mead said. “Wyoming's wolf management plan is working well.''
Mead said hunters are turning over samples that allow the state to track the genetic diversity of the population. “Wyoming set up a conservative hunt and will easily maintain the necessary wolf population and effectively manage the wolves as agreed upon with the federal government,'' he said.
The lawsuit is the latest in a seemingly endless stream of litigation over Wyoming's efforts to exert control over a population of gray wolves that has been expanding in the state since the federal government reintroduced the species in Yellowstone National Park in the mid-1990s.
The Fish and Wildlife Service had accepted a similar delisting plan from Wyoming in 2007 but later repudiated it after a federal judge in Montana criticized it in response to an earlier legal challenge from environmental groups. The federal agency in recent years had delisted wolves in both Montana and Idaho but had kept authority over them in Wyoming.
Preso said the current Wyoming plan is “the kissing cousin'' of the plan the Fish and Wildlife Service previously rejected.
“The changes that were made since the Fish and Wildlife Service rejected the plan essentially amount to new window dressing on a plan that still calls for wolf eradication across the majority of the state and does not provide guarantees that the Yellowstone wolf population will be connected to other wolves and won't end up as an isolated, island population,'' Preso said.


t
__________________
"I, however, view ethics as an individual decision. My ethics are mine - and I won't explain or justify them to anyone else. I seek nobody's approval, just that of my own conscience. "

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-18-2012, 09:17 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Eastern Oregon
Posts: 112
Re: Anti's Sue Over Wyo Wolves....Again

The enviro's will NEVER be happy. It sounds like Wyoming is doing the right thing.
__________________
Jarhead3
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-31-2012, 12:03 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: St Anthony ID
Posts: 14
Re: Anti's Sue Over Wyo Wolves....Again

Wyo. plan meets every aspect +some that US wildlife set forth in the origanal agreement. why should they be forced to accept more? Were they being lied to from the start? Of corse they were. Here in Idaho we have at least 7 times as many as they said we needed. They don't count any in the wildernesses in the middle of the state. but now they say that lowering the number wil cause irreparable harm. We have all been lied to by our government. States rights tell the Feds they have no control or input. Wolves are not interstate commerce
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-02-2013, 10:25 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Gillette, WY
Posts: 2,763
Re: Anti's Sue Over Wyo Wolves....Again

This type of thing really makes me sick, seriously churns my stomach. How we could ever come to the mindset that allowing those outside your state dictate what takes place inside your state is absolutely ludicrous. If the GOV wants to control the INVASIVE CANADIAN timber wolves inside the park, fine, that is federal land. Anything outside the Park should be fair game to be controlled just like every other predator.

To pander to these anti's just because they balk louder than the rest is annoying. It's always said that "the squeaky wheel gets the grease".... maybe they should consider replacing that wheel

Our control plan was reviewed & approved by appropriate entities, there is ZERO legitimate cause for any further review at this point. They are wasting tax payer money on a subject for which they were asked no input.

With luck, Wyoming again will stand tall in the face of adversity & tell the anti's & if necessary the GOV, to "stuff it". Our way or the highway, take your pick.


t
__________________
"I, however, view ethics as an individual decision. My ethics are mine - and I won't explain or justify them to anyone else. I seek nobody's approval, just that of my own conscience. "

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-02-2013, 01:44 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 101
Re: Anti's Sue Over Wyo Wolves....Again

Quote:
Originally Posted by Outlaw6.0 View Post
This type of thing really makes me sick, seriously churns my stomach. How we could ever come to the mindset that allowing those outside your state dictate what takes place inside your state is absolutely ludicrous. If the GOV wants to control the INVASIVE CANADIAN timber wolves inside the park, fine, that is federal land. Anything outside the Park should be fair game to be controlled just like every other predator.

To pander to these anti's just because they balk louder than the rest is annoying. It's always said that "the squeaky wheel gets the grease".... maybe they should consider replacing that wheel

Our control plan was reviewed & approved by appropriate entities, there is ZERO legitimate cause for any further review at this point. They are wasting tax payer money on a subject for which they were asked no input.

With luck, Wyoming again will stand tall in the face of adversity & tell the anti's & if necessary the GOV, to "stuff it". Our way or the highway, take your pick.


t
That's what I'm talkin about! Leave us alone and let us deal with our wildlife issues ourselves. What difference does it really make to them?! If they spent as much energy worrying about bigger issues than how we handle the wolves, maybe our country would be better off... and to the anti's, like it or not, hunting is conservation!!!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-02-2013, 01:52 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Gillette, WY
Posts: 2,763
Re: Anti's Sue Over Wyo Wolves....Again

Quote:
Originally Posted by J300UM View Post
That's what I'm talkin about! Leave us alone and let us deal with our wildlife issues ourselves. What difference does it really make to them?! If they spent as much energy worrying about bigger issues than how we handle the wolves, maybe our country would be better off... and to the anti's, like it or not, hunting is conservation!!!


You're absolutely right, we as sportsmen have contributed to & helped the G&F increase game population more than the these nut jobs EVER will. Why, do you ask?

Because we actually know what the hell we're talking about, that's why.


t
__________________
"I, however, view ethics as an individual decision. My ethics are mine - and I won't explain or justify them to anyone else. I seek nobody's approval, just that of my own conscience. "

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-02-2013, 02:26 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 2,613
Re: Anti's Sue Over Wyo Wolves....Again

A lot of money changes hands on the wolf. The wolf also being taken off the list scares hell out of the anti crowd. What's next? I'd like a Bald Eagle mount, A Golden better, but the point is they can't let go of the ESA because its not about saving troubled species, if it ever was.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Anti's Sue Over Wyo Wolves....Again
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Getting on some wolves?? Driller54 Wolf Hunting 1 07-05-2012 12:07 PM
Anti's drone shot down over private land Dooner Politics Of Hunting And Guns (NOT General Politics) 9 02-28-2012 01:33 PM
Wolves in the AZ Strip M_freeman Politics Of Hunting And Guns (NOT General Politics) 0 01-22-2012 07:05 PM
How wolves do it! bigngreen General Discussion 9 12-03-2011 08:08 PM
Wake up anti's and the indifferent!!! sjadventures Politics Of Hunting And Guns (NOT General Politics) 1 01-05-2008 06:07 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC