
Group Therapy  The Problem: How Accurate Is Your Rifle? 
Page 2/2
How Far Out Is "Unusual"? Building The Model
In order to do a good job of evaluating what constitutes “normal random variation,” or common cause, and what is unusual enough to constitute special cause, we need a basis of comparison. So we need some sort of model, based on random variation.
If the model can explain Jim’s experience in terms of normal, random variation, there is no benefit in looking for any special explanation, such as flinch or stock pressure. If normal random variation cannot explain the variation in group size, then Jim does have some work to do on his rifle. This approach will answer one of our two original questions. With a little additional work, we can get our second answer out of the same pile of data.
Group size is kind of an ugly quantity to model mathematically. I thought about it for a while, and then decided that the convenient approach was simulation. I simply created 20,000 simulated shots in a computer, with normally distributed horizontal and vertical components. I then had the computer find the group size for three, four, and fiveshot groups, and drew conclusions from that. If the rifle is free from special cause, this makes a very good model.
I fear that the gory mathematical details would be enough to cause some readers to run screaming from the room, so, to avoid that, and to spare readers’ spouses, I have shielded your gentle eyes from all that, and simply report the findings that I think may be useful or entertaining. The two masochistic readers in the entire world who are truly interested in all the details can contact me directly.
Figure 4
Figure 4 is the result of the simulation, and it gives us a reference that shows what normal, common cause behavior is. Note that a rifle with a true threeshot average group size of 1" will naturally produce a fairly broad range of group sizes, without any identifiable change in the shooter, the firearm, or the ammunition. Also note that a 1" rifle will, on rare occasions, produce a few groups as large as 2.4", and a few as small as 0.2", just from normal random variation. If you shoot enough groups, the worst sewerpipe bullet hose you can find occasionally will shoot a fine group. And it wasn’t anything you did. It was just your lucky day.
The Results And Conclusions
1. If the bullet impact distances from the center are normally distributed, then the distribution of group is not normally distributed, as shown in Figure 4. This distribution shows what you can expect when shooting threeshot groups, when only common cause is present, i.e., no changes in the rifle, ammunition, or shooter.
More than half the curve lies below the mean. More often than not, this type of sample will underestimate the true mean. Yup: You’ll more often than not get a group size that is better than you “should.”
This also can explain my friend Jim’s result. A rifle that has a longterm average group size of 1", for an easy example, will fairly often produce groups as small as 5/8". Chances are, your next group won’t be that small. It doesn’t matter, it’s not telling you that anything has changed, and there isn’t much you can do about it anyway, short of something major like a new barrel.
Figure 5
2. If you want to convert the longterm average of groups shot at three, four, or five shots per group to any other number of shots, you can use the numbers from Figure 5. If you’ve been keeping careful track of the size of your fiveshot groups, and they are averaging 0.75", you could expect 0.75" x 0.79 = 0.59" groups if you switch to threeshot groups. The numbers in the table were found using calculations from the large simulation shown in Figure 4.
3. This conclusion may be the most difficult to grasp, and the most important: From the simulation, we know how broad a dispersion we can expect from groups with various numbers of shots. Common statistical practice is to choose limits that include 95 percent of the data. Variation within these limits should be interpreted as normal, random variation, and not variation due to changes in rifle, shooter, or ammunition.
For threeshot groups: 43 percent of the longterm average to 165 percent of the longterm average is just normal, random variation.
For fourshot groups: 53 percent of the longterm average to 154 percent of the longterm average is just normal, random variation.
For fiveshot groups: 58 percent of the longterm average to 147 percent of the longterm average is just normal random variation.
If your rifle prints 1" threeshot groups on average, no single group that is larger than 0.43 inch or smaller than 1.65 inches is evidence of real change.
This ought to give you pause when you see an article testing one brand of ammunition against another, with only one fiveshot group representing each brand. Such comparisons are close to worthless, for the reasons shown here.
If you want to test the longterm group size of your rifle, I suggest that you shoot three fiveshot groups and take the average. This average will give you the true value, plus or minus 25 percent, 95 percent of the time. Getting it much tighter than that takes a lot more ammunition. Shooting twelve groups instead of three roughly halves the error. Three fiveshot groups are a good balance between precision and cost.
4. If you shoot a fiveshot group whose longest dimension is at least three times the dimension at right angles to the longest dimension, you have a sample that strongly indicates stringing. If the ratio is less than 3:1, a single oblong group is not evidence of stringing.
The author can be contacted at denton@pmg.cc.
The VARMINT HUNTER Magazine, a 208page publication put together for shooters by shooters. The Varmint Hunters Association, Inc. hosts several 600yard IBS matches, a coyote calling contest, and an annual Jamboree in Fort Pierre, SD. The Jamboree is a weeklong shooting event known as "a summer camp for shooters".
Join the discussion of this article HERE at the Article Discussion Forum.
<Previous  Home


Featured Give Away Contests 




